|

Vocational Education and Training and the Labour Market in Latvia
In the surveys conducted by the
Central Bureau of Statistics, it has been established that in May 2000 162.3
thousand, i.e. 14.4% of all economically active inhabitants were actively
looking for work (actual unemployment), but only 9% had officially
registered as unemployed. However, these general figures which apply to the
country as a whole do not reflect significant differences according to age,
gender and level of education, as well as differences which exist among
different regions. The contrast between urban and rural areas is so great
that it creates a need for differentiated studies. The proportion of
jobseekers is higher in the cities than it is in the countryside – 15.7% and
11.0%, respectively (13.9% in Riga). This can be partially explained by the
fact that persons who work on farms, family or auxiliary farms are
considered to be employed. On the other hand, there are fewer officially
registered unemployed in the cities than in the countryside – 10% and 12.7%,
respectively (12.7% in Riga). This could indicate that in urban areas, and
particularly in Riga, jobseekers much less frequently use the assistance of
the State Employment Service to find work.
Since
people under forty years of age are concentrated in urban areas where there
is a greater variety of employment and social opportunities, the proportion
of the able-bodied population in cities of all regions is much greater than
in rural areas. In May 1997, 163.4 thousand city-dwellers, or 5/6 of the
total number of jobseekers, were looking for work, but in the year 2000,
there were 127.1 thousand city-dwellers, or approximately 4/5 of the total
number of jobseekers.
The
greatest proportion of economically active inhabitants occurs in Riga (59%);
in May 2000, 35% of the nation’s economically active population was living
in Riga and, accordingly, the same amount of all jobseekers. If in 1997,
regardless of gender and education, the proportion of jobseekers among all
groups of economically active inhabitants was greater in Riga than anywhere
else, then in 1999 the difference dissipates, but in May 2000, in Riga the
proportion was 13.9% (in urban areas as a whole – 15.7%).
Regardless of age, every sixth
economically active inhabitant is looking for work. More than one fifth (in
1999) of the total of jobseekers is younger than 25 (and 62% of them are
men). In the age group 25-40 the number of men and women is approximately
the same and this group makes up more than one third of the total number of
jobseekers. The age group 40-50 makes up 22% of all jobseekers and in this
group almost 47% are men. The division of jobseekers according to age group
in 1999 has not changed significantly as compared to 1998, and remains
practically the same also in 2000.
Figure 4. Distribution of urban
jobseekers according to age group
 
The lack of specific
vocational training creates problems on the labour market. In May 1999,
44.8% (50.2% in 1997) of urban jobseekers did not have specific vocational
training – they had attained general secondary education, basic education or
incomplete basic education. In turn, 10.3% (8.7% in 1997) of jobseekers
where university graduates.
According to the proportion
of jobseekers in groups having varying levels of education (i.e., for
example, the number of jobseekers who are university graduates compared to
the total number of economically active inhabitants who are university
graduates), it is clear that the proportion of jobseekers sharply decreases,
with the increase of education level. This trend has continued for some
time now. For example, of those economically active inhabitants who have
completed or not completed basic education, one third were looking for work
in 1997 (32.6%), one fourth in 1999 (23.6%), while only every twelfth
university graduate was looking for work in 1997, and every fourteenth in
1999. The proportion of jobseekers among groups of economically active
inhabitants having varying levels of education is shown in figure five. In
order to ascertain gender differences, further research would be necessary.
Figure
5.

In the
year 2000, among the economically active urban population, 16.4% were men
seeking jobs and 14.8% were women seeking jobs (in 1999 15.4% were men and
15.9% were women), as compared to 20.2% men and 18.6% women in 1997. In
2000, just as in 1997, the risk of unemployment was greater for men, in
contrast to 1999, when it was similar for both men and women. Among the
groups having attained higher education or not having completed basic
education, the larger proportion of jobseekers are men. The particularly
high proportion of jobseekers among men without a basic education could be
explained by the low level of social activity and sense of responsibility of
this population group.
Previous
work experience of urban jobseekers
Sixty
percent of urban jobseekers have previous work experience. It is difficult
to draw conclusions concerning the demand for labour with professional
experience, however it is likely that jobseekers with professional
experience are at an advantage on the labour market. Entrepreneurs
generally give preference to candidates with professional experience when
recruiting, particularly in small crafts-based enterprises which are
characteristic of Latvia. However, it is not certain that prior
professional experience is useful to new, modern enterprises dealing with
new technologies (in the CBS Labour Force Survey, previous experience is not
taken into account, if employment was discontinued three years prior to the
survey). It continues to be the case that in urban areas the previous
experience of jobseekers is generally in industry.
The five
main areas of previous work experience among women pertain to 81%, which
includes 38% women with previous experience in industrial manufacturing.
Figure 6.

Figure 7.

The five
main areas of previous work experience among men pertain to 78%, which
includes 30% men with previous experience in industrial manufacturing.
Professional experience in salaried employment among jobseekers is dominated
by industry (processing). It could be interesting to note the differences
among men and women in terms of professional experience. Regardless of
gender, about one third have previous professional experience in industry.
Another sector which men and women have in common, which never-the-less is
dominated by women, is commerce. Along side these similarities there are
also marked differences which characterise the labour market. Employment in
the hospitality sector (hotels and restaurants), estate handling, leasing
and business, as well as provision of other services (public, social and
individual) is characteristic of women, while construction, transportation
and communications and related services are the province of men.
In May 2000, as in May 1999, 21% or
only 1/5 of all jobseekers resided in rural areas (in 1997 it was 14% or
1/7).
Figure 8.
Distribution of rural jobseekers by age group

In 1999, as in 1997, two thirds
of all rural jobseekers are under 40 years of age, but the number of
jobseekers under 25 years old is increasing – 15% in 1997 and 24% in 1999.
As can be seen, it is young people who are having difficulties finding
employment in rural areas, and this could be the reason why they migrate to
cities.
Figure 9.

Education
level of rural jobseekers
Figure
10. shows that it is even more difficult to find employment without specific
vocational training in rural areas than in urban areas.
Figure 10.

One
third of rural jobseekers (27.1% in 1997 and 32.3% in 1999) have attained
only basic education, or lower. Often this is not enough to be competitive
on the labour market. This population group, of which, as in 1997, two
thirds are men, definitely requires training courses that would allow them
to increase their level of education and acquire qualifications.
Unfortunately, for persons with a low level of education, acquiring new
skills in short-term courses is highly problematic, yet one fifth of all men
who are rural jobseekers, or every third man of every 10 rural jobseekers is
in this situation (in 1997 it was almost 4 of every 10), thus a rapid
absorption into the labour market is hard to imagine. For comparison, the
level of unemployment among rural inhabitants having achieved higher
education is less than 3%, while among inhabitants having completed basic
education it is 21%.
In contrast to 1997, when the
greatest difficulties in finding employment in rural areas were faced by men
with a low level of education and women who had completed general secondary
education, in 1999 difficulties were faced by men having attained general
basic or secondary education and by women with basic vocational training.
The
proportion of men and women jobseekers is particularly disparate in the
groups having attained secondary vocational and general education. It has
already become a tradition that women in rural areas have fewer
opportunities to enter the labour market. Since job opportunities are
rarely available close to the place of residence, personal transportation is
not available and they are subject to the needs of their family, women are
forced out of the labour market. These circumstances give rise to a
misleadingly low level of formal unemployment.
Figure 11.

The majority of men having either
little education (27.9% have a basic or lower level education), or secondary
technical or general education (29.4%) have no choice but to look for work
with slim chances and little luck. Men at this level of education make up
more than half (57.3%) of all rural jobseekers.
Only
39.8% (50% in 1997) of all rural jobseekers have previous work experience.
There is not as much variety in the type of work experience among rural
jobseekers as among city dwellers. Agriculture is the dominating sector for
previous experience among men jobseekers (36.7%, with 56% in 1997), and it
is characteristic also for women (20%, with 26% in 1997). Additional
difficulties for the rural population are caused by a decline in all types
of manufacturing, combined with a decrease of the agricultural sector. In
1999, 36.7% (56% in 1997) of all men jobseekers had previous work experience
in agriculture, the next three most prevalent areas were industrial
manufacturing (or processing industry) – 28%; construction – 14%; public
administration and defence – 6%. Fifth place is shared by two different
branches: public utilities (electricity, gas and water), as well as
transportation and communications.
Consequently, the majority of men jobseekers have previous work experience
in agriculture, but for women it is in industrial manufacturing. This last
circumstance could be explained by the fact that the out-dated industrial
manufacturing, which mainly employed women, has collapsed in rural areas.
It is not
surprising that rural jobseekers should have previous experience in
agriculture, because agriculture has always been an important sector in
Latvia. As for experience in industrial manufacturing, this can partially
be explained by the reflux of city-dwellers to the countryside. Their
return “to the earth” can be linked to land reforms and the repossession of
family-owned land which had been confiscated by the state during the Soviet
era
Next chapter
Table of contents
Home |